Skip to content

compare

GitDesktop vs Tower

GitDesktop is a free, open-source Tower alternative: the same daily Git craft, plus the parts Tower leaves to the browser. Pull-request review with approval, CI, and issues stay in one window across GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket (on Bitbucket, issues go through a linked Jira project), with releases on GitHub and GitLab. It ships from one codebase to Windows, macOS, and Linux, costs nothing, and runs AI on your own keys or local CLI agents, or not at all.

Verified against Tower for Mac 17.1.1 (dated August 11, 2026) and Tower for Windows 13.2 (dated August 18, 2026), plus Tower's help center, release notes, and pricing pages, on September 5, 2026. Something stale? Open an issue.

Where Tower still wins

  • Undo, everywhere. ⌘Z on a Mac, Ctrl+Z on Windows, across commits, merges, rebases, branch operations, and stashes. GitDesktop journals risky operations, restores dropped stashes, and undoes the last commit; it has no one-keystroke undo for every operation.
  • Branch dependencies. Tower stores parent-child branch relationships in Git config as part of its Custom Workflows. GitDesktop stacks pull requests on the forge instead; local chains are yours to rebase.
  • Hosting-service breadth. Azure DevOps and its Server variant, Beanstalk, and Perforce GitSwarm, alongside the big three. GitDesktop stops at GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket, with Jira Cloud for issues.
  • Years of polish on the Git craft. The drag-and-drop interactive rebase and the conflict wizard are the product's spine, and user reviews consistently credit Tower with making complex operations approachable.
  • Free for students, educators, and non-profits. With an academic or non-profit affiliation, the subscription drops to zero. GitDesktop is free for everyone either way.

Feature by feature

Both clients cover the fundamentals: clone, stage by file, hunk, or line, commit, branch, stash, sync, resolve conflicts, rebase interactively, manage worktrees and submodules. The table keeps to where they diverge, in both directions.

Capability Tower GitDesktop
Where you can use it
Free to use No — subscription tiers from $69 to $149 per user per year; free for students, educators & non-profits Yes — free & open source (Apache-2.0); there is no paid plan
Works after the subscription ends No — its pricing page: access ends with the last paid period Yes — nothing to license or renew
Linux No — macOS & Windows only Yes — Windows, macOS & Linux
Same features on every platform No — separate apps on separate tracks — Mac sits at v17, Windows at v13; several features are Mac-only Yes — one codebase, one release cycle across all three platforms
Hosting services Yes — GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Azure DevOps, Beanstalk & Perforce GitSwarm Yes — GitHub (+ Enterprise), GitLab (+ self-managed) & Bitbucket — Bitbucket issues via linked Jira
Pull requests
Approve or request changes in-app No — its PR actions are comment, merge, close & inspect (Mac adds check out) Yes — on all three forges; thread resolution on GitHub & GitLab
Line-anchored review comments No — one flat conversation per pull request Yes — single lines or dragged ranges; drafts batch and survive a restart
Apply a reviewer's suggestion locally No Yes — straight to your working tree
Create, comment & merge in-app Yes — on GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket & Azure DevOps Yes — merge & squash on all three; rebase (GitHub), fast-forward (Bitbucket)
Stacked branches, locally Yes — parent-child dependencies stored in Git config; a Pro line item on its pricing page No — local chains are rebased by hand; stacks live on the forge instead
Stacked PRs on the forge Partial — through the Graphite integration — Pro tier, plus a Graphite account & CLI, built on GitHub Yes — native: create, extend & dissolve stacks (GitHub); MR chains detected (GitLab)
Local PRs with no remote at all No Yes — review & merge offline, promote later
CI, releases & findings
See & control CI runs No — no CI surface Yes — runs, jobs & logs; re-run, cancel & dispatch (GitHub, GitLab & Bitbucket)
Debug a failed CI run with AI No Yes — the failing step's log, explained in-app
Publish releases No Yes — create, edit & upload assets (GitHub & GitLab)
Security findings in-app No — a pre-commit secret-scan hook in its hooks library; no forge findings surface Yes — Dependabot alerts, advisories, code & secret scanning (GitHub); SAST, secrets & code quality (GitLab)
Issues & trackers
Work with issues in-app No — issue numbers in commit messages become links out to your tracker Yes — GitHub & GitLab issues (sub-issues on GitHub, related issues on GitLab), plus private local issues
Jira No — referenced keys link out Yes — browse, create, comment, transition & log work on a linked Jira Cloud project
GitHub Discussions No Yes — read, comment, mark answers
History & safety
Undo the last operation with one keystroke Yes — ⌘Z / Ctrl+Z across commits, merges, rebases, branch operations & stashes Partial — the last commit, one click; riskier operations are journaled for recovery, not one-key undone
Clean up squash-merged branches Partial — on Mac (Tower 17), by matching merged PRs; not in Tower for Windows Yes — PR-aware on every platform, so squash & rebase merges count
AI — one feature or the whole loop
AI commit messages Partial — Mac only, via a locally installed Claude Code or Codex CLI, with prompt presets Yes — every platform — your own keys (Anthropic, OpenAI, Google, OpenRouter), local Ollama, or the same keyless CLIs
AI past the commit message No Yes — PR & issue descriptions, conflict help & CI debugging
AI code review & security audit No Yes — agentic & read-only; postable as a PR comment
Delegate whole tasks to coding agents No Yes — Claude Code, Codex, Copilot & opencode in parallel worktrees; optional container sandbox
Use it from an AI assistant (MCP) No Yes — GitDesktop doubles as an MCP server — read-only by default

Every Tower cell was checked against Tower's own release notes, help center, and pricing pages on the date above, per platform. Rows where both clients are simply fine were left out on purpose. Also compared: GitDesktop vs GitHub Desktop, GitDesktop vs Sourcetree, and GitDesktop vs GitKraken — or see all comparisons.

Create, comment, merge, close, inspect — and that's the list

That list is Tower's own feature-page copy; its per-platform help pages document commenting, merging, closing, and inspecting (check out joins them on the Mac app), with comments forming one conversation on the whole PR. Approval, request-changes, and line-anchored review comments aren't among them; a review still means the browser. In GitDesktop the whole review lives next to your staging and history: comments on exact lines or dragged ranges, suggestions applied to your working tree, approve or request changes, and the merge, on GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket.

A pull request in GitDesktop: CI checks with per-job status, an automated review, and the merge action — the review loop Tower sends to the browser

Common questions

Is GitDesktop a free Tower alternative?

For the daily Git loop and the forge loop, yes. GitDesktop is free and open source (Apache-2.0), runs on Windows, macOS, and Linux, and keeps pull-request review, CI, and issues in the app across GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket (on Bitbucket, issues go through a linked Jira project), with releases on GitHub and GitLab. It does not have Tower's one-keystroke undo for every operation, its local branch dependencies, or its Azure DevOps and Beanstalk support — the sections above count both directions.

Can Tower approve pull requests?

No. Tower's help pages for both platforms document the pull-request actions as adding a comment, merging, closing, and inspecting (the Mac app adds check out), and comments form a single conversation on the whole PR. There is no approve or request-changes action and no line-anchored commenting. GitDesktop submits real reviews on GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket: line-anchored threads, suggestions applied locally, and a verdict.

Does Tower run on Linux?

No. Tower ships for macOS and Windows only, and one subscription covers both. GitDesktop ships the same free app on Windows, macOS, and Linux.

Is Tower the same app on Windows and on a Mac?

They are separate products on separate release tracks: as of the date above, Tower for Mac is at version 17.1.1 while Tower for Windows is at 13.2. AI commit messages (Tower 16) and pull-request-based merge detection in branch cleanup (Tower 17) exist only in the Mac app. GitDesktop ships from one codebase, so releases land on Windows, macOS, and Linux at once.

Try the whole loop.

Free, open source, and nothing to sign up for. Keep Tower installed; GitDesktop needs no migration, no account, and no seat.